Legal Opinion

Orcutt v. Hausmer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1934No. 2946Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By LLOYD, J.

Hausmer filed a motion in this court to dismiss the petition in error for the reason that the action of the Court of Common Pleas in “striking out certain matters in the answer of the defendant below is not a final order” and “for the' further reason s * •' that plaintiff in error 'never asked the court for leave to amend her petition.” It is apparent that this m°tt°n should bo overruled.

The judgment for'costs rendered on the sustaining' of the demurrer to the cross-petition of Orcutt was a final order and the cross-petition certainly states a good' cause of action. It…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Metcalf v. LayOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API