Legal Opinion
United States v. Armando Balbino Ramos, Evaristo Ramos
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 18, 1991No. 89-6267PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Per curiam
In this cocaine possession with intent to distribute case, we refuse to apply our en banc holding in United States v. Piccinonna, 885 F.2d 1529 (11th Cir.1989), retroactively and affirm the judgments and sentences.
FACTS
On December 8, 1988, Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) officials arrested Evaristo and Balbino Ramos after seizing several kilograms of cocaine, a cache of firearms, drug paraphernalia, and approximately $30,000 in cash from their house and from Balbino Ramos’s automobile. Four versions of the facts surrounding the events at the house prior to the arrest exist due to the DEA…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Carlos Enrique Ramirez-ChilelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Douglas McClish v. Richard B. NugentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Michael R. Ray v. Equifax Information ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Charles J. Spears, Also Known as "Blackie," and Donald Meeks, United States of America v. Kim CurranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.