Legal Opinion

Navracel v. Cudahy Packing Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1922No. 22198Published

1OpinionLetton, J.

The question involved being of much importance, argument was allowed, and has been had, upon a motion for rehearing. The former opinion is reported, ante, p. 506. *513We have reexamined the question and are confirmed in the views expressed therein. In some states special provisions are made in the compensation laws for such cases, but here the legislature has left room for such remedial legislation, the need of which was not foreseen.

In England, where the injury was caused by the personal negligence or wilful act of the employer, or some person for whose default the employer is liable, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Toledo Cooker Co. v. SniegowskiOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Troy Laundry MacHinery Co. v. Drivers' Independent Laundry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. Schmidt v. Kansas City Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API