Legal Opinion

Forbes v. Todd

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoughran, J.

This action was brought in 1930 to annul a conveyance of real property made May 19, 1909. Plaintiff is the sole heir at law of the deceased grantor. The grantees, nephews of the grantor, are the principal defendants. The trial court dismissed the complaint, holding that the instrument assailed by plaintiff was the free and deliberate act of her ancestor, and that, in any event, the cause of action accrued in 1909 and was barred by the Statute of Limitations. The Appellate Division, two justices dissenting, reversed that ruling and, upon new findings, directed the judgment demanded by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. York Mortgage Corp. v. Clotar Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Valentine v. . RichardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Piper v. . HoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. MacCracken v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Aerated Products Co. of Buffalo, Inc. v. GodfreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Mutual Life Insurance v. HolleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Forbes v. ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API