Legal Opinion
Crutcher v. Noel
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 25, 1974No. 16PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
The sole question for decision is presented by the following assignment of error:
“The Court erred in permitting counsel for defendant. Noel to argue to the jury that doctors who were not called .as witnesses by the defendant would have testified that Dr. Noel performed the operation on Mrs. Crutcher correctly and that nurses would have told Dr. Finch that the bandage was on too tight, as set forth in Plaintiff’s Exception Numbers 5, 6 and 7.”
During the jury arguments, counsel for plaintiff argued that defendant indicated to plaintiff and the court during jury selection, that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The People v. IzzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. . KnottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- State v. . LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Perry v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Cuthrell v. . GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. NoellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Gathers v. Harris Teeter Supermarket, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Hudgins v. WagonerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Roberts v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Johnson v. Amethyst Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.