Betty Matthews v. United States of America William French Smith, Attorney General of the United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether the defendant, the United States of America, is immune from suit in this action because it is a statutory employer within the meaning of the Maryland Workers’ Compensation Act. The district court concluded that the United States did qualify as a statutory employer and granted summary judgment for the defendant. We reverse.
Plaintiff, Betty J. Matthews, initiated this action against the United States pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq., for injuries she received in January of 1984 when she slipped and fell on a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brady v. Ralph Parsons Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- State v. Benjamin F. Bennett Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
- Honaker v. W. C. & A. N. Miller Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Lathroum v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Betty A. Horton v. United States v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zocco v. United States, Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1992
- Pinckney v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
- Uninsured Employers' Fund v. W.M. Schlosser Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Andrew Yurko v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- Banks v. VEPCOCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.