Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

46 South 52nd Street Corp. v. Manlin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1960No. Appeals, 121 and 185Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell :

For reasons hereinafter set forth, I would reverse the decree of the Court below, without any qualifications or reservations.

Defendant Manlin is the absentee owner of a very large permanent newsstand which he erected and maintains on the sidewalk of plaintiffs’ private property. He asserts an exclusive monopolistic right to own, maintain and operate this newsstand (1) on the basis of public convenience and (2) under an ordinance of the City of Philadelphia, but principally (3) under the banner of “freedom of the press”. Plaintiffs filed a…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API