Legal Opinion
Karalis v. Karalis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 26, 1942No. 33,246PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
The complaint, considered as true for purposes of testing the demurrer, alleges that during the time here pertinent, Fred Kara-lis, D. N. Karalis, and John Karalis operated the Lakeview Bakery Company as copartners. The partnership owned a Buick sedan passenger car used in their business. It was registered in the partnership name. On July 22, 1941, John, while negligently driving the Buick with the permission of his partners, ran over and injured his wife, the plaintiff. She brought this action against the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schubert v. August Schubert Wagon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Caplan v. CaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Strom v. StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Drake v. DrakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Woltman v. WoltmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Beaudette v. FranaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Hatzinicolas v. ProtopapasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Kisch v. SkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Cody v. J. A. Dodds & SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- Poepping v. LindemannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.