Legal Opinion

Dysart v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1904No. 3005PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion sufficiently states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of forgery, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years and three months.

Appellant insists that the court erred in failing to submit to the jury a charge upon the law of circumstantial evidence. The evidence shows that the instrument alleged to have been altered was a check, signed by T. W. Delaney. The State relied upon Delaney’s testimony, which was to the effect that on July 31, 1903, he contracted with defendant (who was a physician) to treat him for catarrh; that he agreed to pay defendant the sum of $8.25…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  2. Roebuck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. State v. ReesMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Kacy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API