Dysart v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion sufficiently states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
BROOKS, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of forgery, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years and three months.
Appellant insists that the court erred in failing to submit to the jury a charge upon the law of circumstantial evidence. The evidence shows that the instrument alleged to have been altered was a check, signed by T. W. Delaney. The State relied upon Delaney’s testimony, which was to the effect that on July 31, 1903, he contracted with defendant (who was a physician) to treat him for catarrh; that he agreed to pay defendant the sum of $8.25…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Roebuck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- State v. ReesMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- Kacy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.