Legal Opinion

Hudiburg Chevrolet, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided September 12, 2003No. 05-02-01166-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By Justice WHITTINGTON.

Hudiburg Chevrolet, Inc. and Hudiburg Chevrolet Holding, Inc. (“Hudiburg”) appeal the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of General Motors Corporation (“GM”) and Rawson-Koenig, Inc. (“Rawson”). In four issues, Hudiburg contends GM and Rawson were not entitled to summary judgment because GM and Rawson failed to conclusively establish (i) their entitlement to summary judgment on Hudiburg’s statutory and common law claims; (ii) Hudiburg was not an innocent retailer; (iii) Hudiburg’s negligence was the sole cause of the loss; and (iv) that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Lear Siegler, Inc. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. Hudiburg Chevrolet, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. McMahon Contracting, L.P. v. City of Carrollton, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  3. Southern Electrical Services, Inc. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  4. R.H. Tamlyn & Sons, L.P. v. Scholl Forest Industries, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  5. R. H. Tamlyn & Sons, L.P v. Scholl Forest Industries, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API