Legal Opinion

Matter of Triestman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 2016No. 2015-02038PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In a probate proceeding in which Todd Hutchins Egener and Mark Hutchins Egener, executors of the estate of Mary Amelia Hutchins Triestman, petitioned pursuant to SCPA 2103 and 2104 for the turnover of certain property allegedly belonging to the estate, Edwin Triestman appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, Jr., S.), dated December 9, 2014, as denied that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment dismissing so much of the petition as sought the turnover of 50% of the proceeds from the sale of an art glass…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosenzweig v. FriedlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. In re the Estate of ButtaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Viola v. ViolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. In Re the Estate of FarrarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of DiGiovannaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API