Legal Opinion

Royal v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 7, 1983No. 09 83 001 CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

Ralph Wayne Royal, Jr., complains that his Motion for New Trial should have been granted. The record indicates that the Motion for New Trial, which alleged newly discovered evidence, was filed with affidavit attached; but, thereafter, no hearing was requested or held and no action was taken by the Court either granting or denying the motion.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of misdemeanor theft. The Court assessed a fine of Two Hundred Fifty and No/100 ($250.00) Dollars.

An affidavit attached to a Motion for New Trial is but a pleading that authorizes the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Rios v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Simon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shawn Pinson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API