Legal Opinion

In Re Ingram

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 24, 1978PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a mandamus proceeding. The petitioners are five Constables from Shelby County. They seek to compel the Honorable Kenneth F. Ingram, Presiding Judge of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, to rescind a "directive" issued by him to the clerk of the Circuit Court of Shelby County. The directive requires that all civil process be delivered to the sheriff for service. The directive follows:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHELBY COUNTY, ALABAMA

DIRECTIVE TO THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT REGARDINGCERTAIN PROVISIONS OF RULE 4.1 (b)(1), ALABAMA RULESOF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Under Rule 4.1 (b)(1), Alabama Rules…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Noles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  2. Henry v. WaldropSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Jeter v. State Ex Rel. CarlisleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Woods v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Mathews v. StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Ex Parte Houston County Sheriff GloverSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Ex Parte Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Mobile County Constables Ass'n v. Alabama Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Smith v. SaintCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API