Legal Opinion

Davis v. Holly Sugar Corp.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 3, 1923No. 10,455Published

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Teller

The defendant in error was plaintiff in an action against the plaintiff in error, under the transportation act of 1920, to recover damages for the killing of a mule at Loma, on the D. & R. G. Railroad. The action was begun before a justice of the peace, where judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and an appeal taken to the county court. The case was there tried to a jury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff.

There are, of course, no pleadings in the case. It appears, however, from instruction No. 1, upon which the defendant assigns error, that the action was supposed to be brought…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChurchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  2. Rio Grande Western Railway Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. DunnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. EysterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  5. Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. NevilleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API