IceMOS Technology Corporation v. Omron Corporation
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 IceMOS Technology Corporation, No. CV-17-02575-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Omron Corporation, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff IceMOS Technology Corporation’s Motion to 16 Strike and Preclude Defendant’s Contract Invalidity Defense (Doc. 468). The Motion has 17 been fully briefed. (Doc. 468; Doc. 473; Doc. 476). The Court now rules. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 A contested issue of fact listed in the Joint Proposed Final Pretrial Order is 20 “[w]hether the Supply Agreement is a valid…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Joseph Martin, Jr., Delicatessen, Inc. v. SchumacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Express Industries & Terminal Corp. v. New York State Department of TransportationNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- R & R Sails, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.