Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 23, 1991No. Docket No. 48208-86Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL L. HAMILTON, Transferee, Petitioner v COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Hamilton v. Commissioner

Docket No. 48208-86

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1991-25; 1991 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 19; 61 T.C.M. (CCH) 1708; T.C.M. (RIA) 91025;

January 23, 1991, Filed

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Everett A. Bell, for the petitioner.

Robert W. Kern and Susan Gray, for the respondent.

WHALEN, Judge.

WHALEN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

Respondent determined, pursuant to section 6901, that petitioner is liable, as a transferee of property, for a deficiency in the 1982 Federal…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Tokarski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  2. Commissioner v. SternSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Petzoldt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  4. Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. American Gym, Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. Fred M. Archer and Evie B. Archer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API