Legal Opinion

Boylan v. Vogel

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

The complaint alleges that the defendants Vogel entered into a conspiracy to procure an order dissolving the marriage existing between the plaintiff and Veronica G. Boylan Vogel so that the defendants Vogel might marry; that they employed an attorney “ to maintain by false testimony ” a proceeding for the dissolution of such marriage; that pursuant to said conspiracy a verified petition was presented to the Supreme Court in the county of Rensselaer, N. Y., on February 8, 1928; that the petition was made and verified by Veronica G. Boylan, and states that the petitioner and Thomas Boylan…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Akely v. . KinnicuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. La Van Allen v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Lapiedra v. American Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Model Building & Loan Ass'n Ex Rel. Skinner v. ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Bloom v. GelbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. RandallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Boylan v. VogelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API