Legal Opinion

Royal Industries, Inc. v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 18, 1981No. L79-1091, CA 18556PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUTTLER, P. «J.

In this action for breach of a retail installment contract brought to recover a deficiency judgment and attorney fees, the trial court denied defendant Bullock’s motion for summary judgment and granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against both defendants. Thereafter the court entered judgment against both defendants jointly and severally. Bullock appeals and seeks to reverse the summary judgment as to him; both defendants seek to reverse the court’s award of attorney fees to plaintiff.

In the first assignment of error, Bullock contends that summary judgment was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Union Oil Co. of Calif. v. LullOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hanneman v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Reeder v. KayOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Chada v. TappOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Cottage Grove Lumber Co. v. LillegrenOregon Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKee v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Roberts v. Public Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API