Legal Opinion

Glenbriar Co. v. Nesbitt

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided October 17, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

George M. Heymann, J.

*548Petitioner commenced this holdover proceeding on the ground that the respondents are not residing in the subject premises as their primary residence. Respondents moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On December 31, 1996, petitioner served a notice to tenant of nonrenewal of the lease, termination of tenancy and landlord’s intention to recover possession* advising respondents that their lease is scheduled to expire on April 30, 1997 and that the landlord did not intend to renew it based upon the fact that they were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MATTER OF 61 JANE ST. ASSOCS. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Ansonia Associates v. PearlsteinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
  3. Steinmetz v. BarnettCivil Court of the City of New York · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bel Air Leasing L.P. v. KuperblumCivil Court of the City of New York · 2007
  2. Metz v. DuenasNassau County District Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API