Legal Opinion

McSweeney v. McMillen

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1884No. 9087PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Rush Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

Appellants filed against appellees a petition for the partition of ninety-seven acres of- land, and part of the north half of lot No. 56, in the town of Rushville, and alleging that Mary A. E. McSweeney is the owner of the undivided one-third of the land and one-half of that portion of the lot, and asking that it be set apart and delivered to her.

The petition states, that one John McMillen, in March, 1857, died a resident of said county and State, leaving Mary McMillen, his widow, and Samuel E. McMillen, Rebecca Morris, James T. McMillen and Mary A. E. McMillen, his children ;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pitcher v. LaycockIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Davidson v. NicholsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Palmer v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Johnson v. RockwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Rowe v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spencer v. RobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Robbins v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Tyres v. KennedyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Standard Forgings Co. v. HolmstromIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Kennedy v. HudkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API