Legal Opinion

McIntire v. Preston

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1848PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Debt, in the Pike Circuit Court, brought by the «plaintiff in error against the defendant in error, and heard before the Hon, Norman H. Purple, without the intervention of a jury, at the September term, 1848, when a judgment was rendered for the defendant for costs. The plaintiff entered a motion for a new trial, which was overruled.

1Opinion of the Court

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Trumbull, J.

Mclntire, as the assignee of the “ Ocean Insurance Company,” sued Preston in an action of debt upon a note given to that Company. The declaration is in the usual form. The defendant pleaded nil debet, payment, set-off, and accord and satisfaction, upon all of which pleas issues were joined.

By consent of parties the case was tried by the Court, and upon the trial the plaintiff offered in evidence the Act of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts incorporating the Ocean Insurance Company, a section of the Constitution of Massachusetts declaring…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts v. Town of PawletSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Vallett v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  3. Barker v. Mechanic Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  4. Dutchess Cotton Manufactory v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1817
  5. President of the Northampton Bank v. PepoonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grunloh v. Effingham Equity, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. Auerbach v. Le Sueur Mill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. Am. Nat. Bk. & T. Co. v. Scenic Stage LinesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  4. American Credit & Trust Co. v. WorthingtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  5. In re Marriage of BaumgartnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API