Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bradburn v. North Central Regional Library District

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 2010No. 82200-0Published

1DissentChambers, J.

¶83 (dissenting) — The question before this court is whether, consistent with our state constitution’s *822free speech protections, a public library can actively restrict adult access to web sites containing constitutionally protected speech. The question is easy to answer: of course it cannot.

¶84 Article I, section 5 is direct. It says that “[e]very person may freely speak, write and publish on all subjects, being responsible for abuse of that right.” The freedom to “speak, write and publish” encompasses the freedom to read as well. Cf. Fritz v. Gorton, 83 Wn.2d 275, 297, 517 P.2d 911 (1974)…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Butler v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API