Legal Opinion
People v. Tees
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1971No. 30 October Term 1971, Docket Nos. 52,924, 52,925PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
The controlling question here is substantially the same as that which confronted the Supreme Court in Barber v. Page (1968), 390 US 719 (88 S Ct 1318, 20 L Ed 2d 255), and again in Berger v. California (1969), 393 US 314 (89 S Ct 540, 21 L Ed 2d 508). That question is whether the defendants were deprived of their Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to be confronted by absent —from this joint trial—prosecution witnesses Connie Wood and Victor Postic. For the background of facts giving rise to the stated question, see People v. Tees (1970), 23 Mich App 476 and People v. Batten (1967), 9 Mich…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berger v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. BattenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. TeesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. KirtdollMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. ShepherdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Eastham v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1972
- People v. HunterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- People v. BrooksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.