Smith v. Aurora Public Schools

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE, BUT IMPOSING ALTERNATIVE SANCTIONS

William J. Martinez, United States District Judge

Currently before the Court are two motions: Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Supplement Her Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion to Supplement”) (ECF No. 61), and Defendant’s Motion to Strike (ECF No. 64). The Court denies both motions. However, with respect to Defendant’s Motion to Strike, the Court imposes alternative sanctions on Plaintiff, requiring her to narrow the number of newly claimed…