Legal Opinion

Soap Corporation of America v. Reynolds

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 18, 1950No. 12655PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit, brought by plaintiffs, home owners in the vicinity of defendant’s soap factory, was for an injunction restraining defendant from operating it as a nuisance.

The claim was that after the defendant had, on November 1, 1947, begun the operation of its factory, it started manufacturing raw soap in the plant and in the procesa permitted foul and obnoxious vapors and odors to arise and escape from the premises, causing plaintiffs irreparable damage in their persons and property.

The defendant, admitting the operation of the soap' factory but denying that it emitted…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harrisonville v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Stone v. City of WylieTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Bereslavsky v. KloebCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  4. G., H. S.A. Ry. Co. v. DegroffTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Arizona Copper Co. v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cranor v. 5 Star NutritionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  2. Heuer v. Basin Park Hotel and ResortDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
  3. Town of Surfside v. CTY. LINE LAND CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. DEMMONS v. ND OTM LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023
  5. Texas Auto Salvage, Inc., Gary Hack, and Daniel Hack v. D D Ramirez, Inc., Danny Ramirez Recycling, Inc., San Antonio Auto & Truck Salvage, Danny's Recycling & Precious Metals, LLC, Danny's Recycling, Inc., and Daniel Delagarza Ramirez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API