Legal Opinion

Davidove v. Duvall

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 16, 1931No. [No. 90, October Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

The questions which we are asked to determine on this appeal are the usual ones presented in will contests, except that here the issue submitted to the jury was that of mental capacity, a finding for the caveatee having been directed on the other issues at the close of the evidence offered on behalf of the caveators. The finding on the third issue, that of mental capacity, was in favor of the caveators, which resulted in the breaking of the will; and the caveatee appealed. There •are two exceptions contained in the record, one to a ruling-on evidence, the other to the ruling on the prayers.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Higgins v. CarltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  2. Harris v. HipsleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  3. Stirling v. StirlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  4. Jones v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  5. Crockett v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wolfinger v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  2. Mangione v. SneadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  3. Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Arbogast, Exec. v. MacMillanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Smith v. BiggsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API