Holder v. State
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
CARLTON, J,
for the Court:
¶ 1. Carl Holder appeals the dismissal of his motion for post-conviction relief (PCR). Holder claims that: (1) his guilty pleas were not knowingly and voluntarily entered; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel; and (3) he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his PCR motion. Finding no error, we affirm.
FACTS
¶ 2. Holder was indicted for the crimes of burglary of a dwelling and capital murder. Holder pleaded not guilty to both charges. Subsequently, the State offered Holder a plea deal that reduced the capital-murder charge to manslaughter; on March 30,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Foster v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2004
- Burrough v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
- Gable v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Small v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014
- Rustin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014