Legal Opinion
Professional Performance Development Group, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 4, 2015No. 13-454 CPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. ¶ 7101-09
OPINION and ORDER
Block, Judge.
Before the court is defendant’s partial motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”).
In this action, plaintiff, Professional Performance Development Group, Inc. (“PPDG”), challenges the decision of the United States Department of the Army (“Army”) to partially terminate for cause three task orders. PPDG brings this suit under the Contract Disputes Act (“CDA”), 41 U.S.C. ¶ 7101-09 (formerly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.