United States v. Lo Biondo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict that he was guilty of “wilfully and knowingly” possessing the unstamped cans of alcohol. At the time of his arrest he was carrying two of the five-gallon cans along the hallway of a building in front of which Lo Biondo, a co-defendant who pleaded guilty, was stowing similar cans in an automobile. Four other cans were on the floor of the hall and four more had already been put into the car. The cans were so wrapped in paper that no one could see without removing the wrappings whether they bore tax stamps.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- United States v. SeboCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Yep v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Wheeler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
3Cited by19 opinions
- Raymond R. Fowle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Billy Joe Helton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Timothy Alexander MullingsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- United States v. On LeeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Ong Way Jong, Alias Johnny Ong, and Wee Zee Yep v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.