Legal Opinion
State v. Galazz
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 11, 2009No. 3D07-3292PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The State appeals an order granting a motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm.
Defendant-appellee Geseppe Galazz entered into a plea agreement with the State regarding the charge of purchase, or possession with intent to purchase, cocaine. Pursuant to the agreement, the defendant admitted the offense in exchange for a withhold of adjudication and a suspended entry of sentence (“SES”). Two and one-half years later, the defendant filed the Rule 3.800(a) motion, arguing that the sentence was illegal. The trial court vacated the sentence and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Helton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Ruiz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Sainz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Mazza v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. OrtizDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- State v. RobinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Advanced Benefit Concepts, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Access Health, Inc. & Preferred Care Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
- FIGUERREO v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010