Legal Opinion

Gump v. Hobart Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1984No. 83AP-451Published

1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, P.J.

This cause is before the court upon relator Robert Gump’s complaint and respondent employer Hobart Corporation’s cross-claim in mandamus. By his action, relator Gump seeks to have this court order respondent Industrial Commission to find him to be temporarily and totally disabled and entitled to compensation accordingly; whereas, by its cross-claim, respondent Hobart seeks to have this court order respondent Industrial Commission to vacate and set aside all orders after July 8, 1981 pertaining to relator’s claim and to suspend consideration of his claim effective July 1981.

There is no dispute…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Molden v. Callander Cleaners Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API