Legal Opinion

Wilbur v. Arkuszewski

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided December 18, 1970No. Civ. A. Nos. 2462, 2463PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDERS

NEESE, District Judge.

These are diversity actions for unliquidated damages for personal injuries involving common questions of law and fact. They hereby are consolidated for purposes of trial. Rule 42(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Stemler v. Burke, C.A.6th (1965), 344 F.2d 393, 396[2].

At the request of the respective plaintiffs, the clerk properly entered the default of the defendant Mr. Frank H. Lane for his failure to plead or otherwise defend, Rule 55(b) (1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Proper application having been made, and it appearing by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peitzman v. City of IllmoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  2. Stemler v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  3. Atnip v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Standard Forms Co. v. NaveDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API