Legal Opinion

Coleman v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 26, 1938No. Gen. No. 40,381PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Denis E. Sullivan

delivered the opinion of the court.

An interlocutory order was entered in the superior court restraining the defendant city of Chicago, its mayor, commissioner of police, and their agents, from interfering with the operation and use by the plaintiffs in the city of Chicago of certain coin operated implements or devices called “Bowlette,” “Roll-a-Ball,” “Roll-a-Score,” “Skee Ball,” “Bowl-a-Ball,” “Bally-roll,” “Skee-roll,” “Bank-Roll” and “Rock-o-Ball,” and it is from that order that this appeal is taken.

It is claimed by the City that the keeping and nse of these…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kitt v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Silfen v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  3. Berman v. PrendergastAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API