Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hargraves v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 2013No. Nos. 08-CF-346, 08-CF-376, 08-CF-474Published

1ConcurrenceNewman, Senior Judge

Having authored what is viewed by some as the leading opinion by this court on the issue of judicial discretion, see Johnson v. United States, 898 A.2d 854 (D.C.1979), and having written often on the issue of our measure of appellate review, see, e.g., Davis v. United States, 564 A.2d 31 (D.C.1989) (en banc); United States v. Felder, 548 A.2d 57 (D.C.1988), and most recently in Porter v. United States, 37 A.3d 251, 268 (D.C.2012) (Newman, J., dissenting), I am constrained to pen a word on the issue of our measure of *949review, in addition to joining the court’s opinion.

The court’s opinion…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. VillegasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Javier IzquierdoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. FelderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API