Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. O'Neil v. Hall
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1941No. Civil No. 4360PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.
The state of Arizona, on the relation of D. C. O’Neil, Thad M. Moore and C. Warren Peterson, as members of and constituting the state tax commission of Arizona, hereinafter called petitioners, filed an original proceeding in this court asking for a writ prohibiting the Honorable William G. Hall, as judge of the superior court of Pima county from entertaining or considering a proceeding brought in the superior court of that county by Tucson Title Insurance Company, hereinafter called the company, under the provisions of sections 73-1540 and 73-1544, Arizona Code, 1939, to review an order of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Blyew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Getzen v. Sumter CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Deflumeri v. SunderlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Estate of Harrison P. Shedd, Deceased First National Bank of Arizona, Phoenix v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- State v. Airesearch Mfg. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Electors of Big Butte Area v. State Board of EducationIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
- Tucson Title Insurance v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1942
- Arizona State Tax Commission v. Catalina Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.