Legal Opinion

Frances F. Love v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 5, 1962No. 16866_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BASTIAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellants [plaintiffs], the beneficiaries named in an accident insurance policy isued by appellee [defendant], filed a complaint in the District Court seeking to recover payments for the death of the insured, in accordance with the terms of the policy. Cross motions for summary judgment were filed by the respective parties, and the District Court granted appellee’s motion. This appeal followed.

The insurance policy in question is styled a “Tripmaster Policy.” It is a limited policy in the sense that it is intended to be effective for only the short period of time during…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Hayes v. Home Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  4. Patterson v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1905
  5. Anna M. McKeever v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Linden Motor Freight Co., Inc. v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  2. Continental Casualty Company v. Virginia Patterson Beelar, M.D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  3. Smith v. Continental Casualty CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Gottfried v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  5. Ross Langdon v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API