Stephens v. State

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

The indictment charges that appellant did by force, threats and fraud, break and enter a house there situate, and owned, occupied and controlled by J. E. Barker, without the consent of the said J. E. Barker, etc.

There are several grounds urged against the sufficiency of the indictment, all of which are without merit. The indictment is in the usual form and sufficiently, charges burglary. One of the grounds is that it does not allege whether the burglary was committed in the daytime or night; nor does it allege what property was stolen, nor the value of the property;…