Legal Opinion

Thiedemann v. Michigan State Board of Dental Examiners

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1919No. Calendar No. 28,785PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Mandamus by William L. Thiedemann to compel the Michigan State board of dental examiners to issue a license for the practice of dentistry.

1Per curiam

In May, 1918, this plaintiff, as petitioner, presented his petition to this court, sworn to May 3, 1918, praying that a writ of mandamus might issue directed to the defendant board, commanding it to cause a license to be issued to him under sections 3 and 5 of Act No. 338 of the Public Acts of 1907, as amended by Act No. 183 of the Public Acts of 1913 (2 Comp. Laws 1915, §§ 6750, 6752), to practice dentistry in this State. He represented that, in the fall of 1917, desiring to locate and practice his profession in this State, he made such application for an examination as to his proficiency in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Thiedemann v. Michigan State Board of Dental ExaminersMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Township of Roscommon v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blickle v. Kent Probate JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Thiedemann v. State Board of Dental ExaminersMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API