Legal Opinion
Brouillard v. Allen
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 21, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
The defendants, Verna G. Allen, Robert W. Macomber, Jr., and Robert J. DeSi-mone, 1 appeal from the denial of their motion for relief from a default judgment entered in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Smith, J.) on the complaint of the plaintiffs, Paul and Sara Brouillard, seeking damages against the defendants for Allen’s alleged breach of contract and for the alleged tortious interference with that contract by Macomber and DeSimone. We affirm the judgment.
In the spring of 1989, the Brouillards entered into an agreement with Allen for the purchase and sale of property…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Regina M. Muratore v. M/s Scotia Prince, Etc., Prince of Fundy Cruises, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Laurel Bank and Trust Co. v. BurnsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Forbes v. Wells Beach Casino, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Flett v. W. A. Alexander & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- Hamm v. HammSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McAlister v. SlosbergSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Harris v. PT Petro Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Williams v. UbaldoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Foley v. AdamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Allen v. BrouillardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.