Greer v. Bank of Damascus
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
This controversy was here before — In re Bauguess, 196 N. C., 278. The plaintiffs only contend that they can recover $3,000 and interest. Why, therefore, compel defendants to pay $7,000 into court? We think in the interest of justice the court should not have ordered more than $3,000 and interest, the amount plaintiffs sue for, to be paid into court. It was discretionary for the court below to withdraw a juror. Wolf v. Goldstein, 192 N. C., 818; S. v. Guice, 201 N. C., 761. The ordering of $7,000 to be paid into court affected a substantial right.
In modifying and affirming this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. . GuiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Wolf v. . GoldsteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- In Re BauguessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976