United States v. Hargrave
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
2Per curiam
The accused was convicted by a general court-martial of possession of marihuana in Naha City, Okinawa, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. He contends that, since the offense was committed outside the limits of any United States military installation on Okinawa, he could not be tried by court-martial for his misconduct. See O’Callahan v Parker, 395 US 258, 23 L Ed 2d 291, 89 S Ct 1683 (1969). In United States v Ortiz, 20 USCMA 21, 42 CMR 213, decided this date, we held that the limitation on court-martial jurisdiction defined in the…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. BeekerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. OrtizUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970