Legal Opinion

United States v. Hargrave

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 14, 1970No. 22,934Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

2Per curiam

The accused was convicted by a general court-martial of possession of marihuana in Naha City, Okinawa, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. He contends that, since the offense was committed outside the limits of any United States military installation on Okinawa, he could not be tried by court-martial for his misconduct. See O’Callahan v Parker, 395 US 258, 23 L Ed 2d 291, 89 S Ct 1683 (1969). In United States v Ortiz, 20 USCMA 21, 42 CMR 213, decided this date, we held that the limitation on court-martial jurisdiction defined in the…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. BeekerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. OrtizUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API