Legal Opinion

Escarria v. American Gage & Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated April 9, 1998, which granted the separate motions of the defendants American Gage & Manufacturing Co. and Boro Park Hardware Corp. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

“The circumstantial evidence of identity of the manufacturer of a defective product causing personal injury must establish that it is reasonably probable,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Healey v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. D'Amico v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Strelov v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Hughes v. Atlantic Oldsmobile, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brenner v. American Cyanamid Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Katz v. Pro Form Fitness, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Tyminskyy v. Sand Man Bldg. Materials, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API