Herold v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*943OPINION.
Miluiken:1
Since the overassessment as to the estate of Mrs. George O. Baird for the year 1922 does not result, so far as the record discloses, from the rejection of a claim in abatement, the Board is without jurisdiction as to such petitioner for said year and the petition, in so far as it involves that year, is dismissed. Cornelius Cotton Mills, 4. B. T. A. 255.
The controlling question in these proceedings is whether the agreement of November 16,1921, between Baird and the Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana, hereinafter referred to as the Gulf Company, was a contract of mortgage or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weiss v. WeinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Burk-Waggoner Oil Assn. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Corbett v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1913
- In re Sheets Printing & Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1905