State v. Brister
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.
The state appeals a ruling on a pretrial motion which suppressed "all evidence which derived directly or indirectly from the actions of police officers in demanding the defendant’s driver’s license.”
We take the material facts from the trial court’s findings contained in the extensive memorandum opinion. Two police officers patrolling in a police vehicle observed defendant driving a vehicle which had no license plates. They observed no moving violations or equipment defects. The officers stopped the vehicle defendant was driving by use of blue flashing lights. One police officer testified the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Palmore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. RuudNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. ZimmerleeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. LeisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.