Legal Opinion
People ex rel. Thompson v. Wilmot
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 14, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
D. Bruce Crew, III, J.
Petitioner has commenced this habeas corpus proceeding to test the validity of a parole revocation hearing determined adversely to him and by reason of which he has been recommitted to the Department of Correctional Services.
Respondents by their return and answer contend, inter alia, that habeas corpus is an inappropriate remedy and that petitioner has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Neither contention is legally tenable (People ex rel. Van Fosson v Dillon, 72 AD2d 166; People ex rel. Newcomb v Metz, 64 AD2d 219).
Petitioner contends, on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. CullNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Guzman v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People ex rel. Newcomb v. MetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Johnson v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People ex rel. Van Fossen v. DillonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People ex rel. MacKelvey v. New York State Division of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People ex rel. Alexander v. LeFevreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People ex rel. Vallejo v. New York State Board of ParoleNew York Supreme Court · 1985