Legal Opinion

Perez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 10, 1991No. 01-90-00425-CRPublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MIRABAL, Justice.

After the trial court overruled a motion to suppress evidence, appellant, Francisco Perez, entered a plea of guilty to the charge of possession of marihuana in a usuable quantity of more than five pounds and less than 50 pounds. The trial court found appellant guilty and assessed punishment, in accordance with a plea bargain agreement, at five years confinement, probated, and a $2000 fine. We affirm.

The issue before this Court is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellant’s motion to suppress based on what appellant contends was an illegal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Josey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  3. Klare v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  4. Laca v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  5. Sims v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API