Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. Forsyth
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by tbe Keystone Manufacturing Company against Charles Forsyth and Charles Neuendorf upon a promissory note. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action was commenced in justice’s court in April, 1891. The declaration was in assumpsit on a promissory note, describing it, and claiming damages of $300. Defendants pleaded the general issue. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendants appealed to the circuit court. The cause was tried in the| circuit, where defendants had judgment, and, on appeal by plaintiff to this court, the case was reversed and remanded for new trial. That case is reported in 115 Mich. 51 (72 N. W. 1109). The cause was again tried in the circuit court, and the *99defendants again had judgment. On appeal here the cause…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Perkins v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. ForsythMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. ForsythMichigan Supreme Court · 1897