Legal Opinion

Rex Pipe & Supply Co. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1994No. 93-1043PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The commissioner, in her appeal, argues that the BTA erred when it received testimony and evidence to amplify and supplement the information submitted to the commissioner during the sixty- and ninety-day grace periods of R.C. 5739.03. Rex maintains that, under Globe Paper Co. v. Lindley (1979), 63 Ohio App.2d 180, 17 O.O.3d 376, 410 N.E.2d 804, the BTA correctly received such evidence. We agree with Rex.

R.C. 5739.03 states:

“[T]he tax imposed by or pursuant to section 5739.02, 5739.021, 5739.023, or 5739.026 of the Revised Code shall be paid by the consumer to the vendor, and each vendor shall…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Globe Paper Co. v. LindleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shugarman Surgical Supply, Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. McLean Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. McLean Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Shugarman Surgical Supply, Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API