Legal Opinion
Russek v. Dag Media Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*458Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered May 3, 2006, awarding defendant the principal sum of $8,055 in attorney fees following dismissal of the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Judgment, same court and Justice, entered August 15, 2006, awarding defendant an additional principal sum of $2,062.50 in attorney fees after denial of plaintiffs motion for reargument and renewal, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered June 28, 2006, which, to the extent appealable, denied plaintiff’s motion for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Horn v. New York TimesNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Havell v. IslamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Ullmann v. Norma Kamali, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- Katz v. TravelersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Weinstein v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- KAREN C. HAN v. FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY SERVICE a South Korean Corporation without capital; HANKOOK TIRE & TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., a South Korean CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Weinstein v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013