Legal Opinion

Weinberg v. Wing

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loreto, J.

Motion to dismiss third-party complaint for legal insufficiency is denied. Since the instant application, the plaintiff has served an amended complaint, which *756now joins the third-party defendant as a defendant in his original action. The service of the said amended complaint even at this stage of the proceedings is timely made (Civ. Prac. Act, § 193-a; Aprea v. City of New York, 11 Misc 2d 645). The amended complaint contains charges of active and passive negligence against both defendants.

The Appellate Division of the First Department recognized in Crawford v. Blitman Constr. Corp. (1 A D 2d…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aprea v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. Incorporated Village of LynbrookNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Weinberg v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API